You are not logged in.
I've been thinking about this for a long time so i need help to conclude whether or not what im thinking is fallacious or some kind of stupid reasoning.
Let's consider 2 events that happen at the same time, event A and event B. And there are 3 spectators, who all witness both events.
A B
1 2 3
Spectator n.1 sees event A first and then event B. And spectator n.3 vice versa (first B, then A)
Spectator n.2 sees both events at the same time.
Some crazy idea is that spectator n.2 is able to see the future of spec. n.1 and spec. n.3 (at the same time), in other words, spec. n.2 sees something that spec. n.1 and 3 will see in the future. But this is wrong because each spectator couldnt possibly know about what the others saw. Nevertheless, there's something that is able to make this crazy idea possible, ''Quantum Entanglement''.
Quantum Entanglement enables to link together quantum particles in a special way that makes them effectively part of the same entity. No matter how far they are from each other, if you alter the state of one of them, the other will also 'feel' the alteration. A change in one is instantly reflected in the other.
As far as i know experiments have only been applied to atoms but in the future it might be possible to apply it to more complex structures. One of the goals of quantum entanglement is to make teletransportation possible, thats why this idea popped into my head.
If it was possible to apply quantum entanglement to the spectators, the information would be teletransported between them, making them aware of what the others are seeing and therefore, in this case, aware of the future. Through spec. 2., spectator 1 would be able to see his future (event B) as well as spec 3 (event A).
Last edited by Yurum Fernandes (2011-07-26 18:41:26)
Offline
Sorry, I got lost in the ''Calgary Edcort'' part. Do you mind explaining it?
Offline