You are not logged in.
As I research more and more I see that the universe is like a musical composition. The string theory proves that. Also the constant motion of the universe shows that the universe is like one. but there are questions I need to ask. If the universe is like a musical composition like Machio Kaku says where is the composer. Every musical composition has a composer. if they didn't where would the music come from? It's impossible. Most people believe everything they hear including evolution. But do they know that 85% of the world's physicist believe that the big bang is impossible without an Intelligent Design. what I am trying to say is where is the composer. I think people should do some research. Maybe that is why they cant find the Higgs particle or the so-called "god-particle". All they want to do is make people think that evolution exists which of coarse they know it doesn't. The reason they refuse to believe in a god is becuase they want to do what they want. They dont want responsibilities besides the ones they have at home or as a scientist. So anyone who contradicts with the ID theory should do a lot of research becuase they might change their mind.
Offline
astrophysicist#1 wrote:
As I research more and more I see that the universe is like a musical composition. The string theory proves that. Also the constant motion of the universe shows that the universe is like one. but there are questions I need to ask. If the universe is like a musical composition like Machio Kaku says where is the composer. Every musical composition has a composer. if they didn't where would the music come from? It's impossible.
You are drawing conclusions about he nature of the universe from a human analogy that you have created. Sprinkling it with a Michio Kaku attribution shows only that Dr. Kaku is a musically inclined and poetic communicator.
Most people believe everything they hear including evolution. But do they know that 85% of the world's physicist believe that the big bang is impossible without an Intelligent Design.
Can you offer citations for either of these claims?
what I am trying to say is where is the composer.
The "composer" exists in your musical analogue. To assume that a similar "composer" is responsible for the creation of the universe is fallacious reasoning.
I think people should do some research. Maybe that is why they cant find the Higgs particle or the so-called "god-particle". All they want to do is make people think that evolution exists which of coarse they know it doesn't. The reason they refuse to believe in a god is becuase they want to do what they want. They dont want responsibilities besides the ones they have at home or as a scientist.
Your personal opinions and suppositions are no substitute for logical conclusions.
So anyone who contradicts with the ID theory should do a lot of research becuase they might change their mind.
What you call "ID theory" is, at best, a fairy taleāit certainly is not a scientific/logical theory. To borrow from Wolfgang Pauli: That theory is worthless. It isn't even wrong!
Offline
logical? evolution is not logical
Offline
astrophysicist#1 wrote:
logical? evolution is not logical
Evolution is a fact. Evolution theory is indeed "logical"; invoking the supernatural to explain things that you don't understand is not.
Offline