Physics education research, electronic materials, and the musings of Christopher Moore, Ph.D.
Physics education research, electronic materials, and the musings of Christopher Moore, Ph.D.
You are not logged in.
If Dark matter had a comon origin with normal matter at the Big Bang things, planets, stars ought to be made mostly of it. The Earth and Sun ought to be made primarily of Dark matter. This clearly is not true. I believe this is a refutation of Dark matter theory. The explanation of the high speed outer stars of galaxies can be handled by spatial expansion itself.
Spatial expansion occures at every scale bringing once inner stars outward sustaining their original speeds but at greater distances. Galaxies are getting bigger as the fabric of space expands. Galactic evolution involves this growth in size.
Mitch Raemsch
Last edited by Nicholas (2008-06-24 02:26:33)
Offline
Why should I believe your theory of cosmology as opposed to the theories of people who, say, have Ph. D.'s in the subject and base their theories on experimental evidence?
Offline
I never said you need to believe me. Can you correct my reasoning?
Dark matter is disproved for the reasons I have stated. That is the purpose of this thread.
Mitch Raemsch; Falling light changes colour
Offline
In order to refute a theory, you need to show that it leads to conclusions that are known to be false. You offer arguments to this end:
Nicholas wrote:
If Dark matter had a comon origin with normal matter at the Big Bang things, planets, stars ought to be made mostly of it. The Earth and Sun ought to be made primarily of Dark matter.
and then you assert that these conclusions are false. I certainly wouldn't contradict you in that regard.
My point is that you have to prove that the false conclusion follows from the theory for your refutation to mean anything. Therefore you must prove directly from the currently accepted theory of dark matter your conclusion that stars and planets should be made predominantly from it.
Offline
The proof is in that they would comingle together at their common origin in the Big bang and would remain congealed. Therefore Dark matter has to comprise most of everything NOW.
Mitch Raemsch
Offline
Nicholas wrote:
they would comingle together at their common origin in the Big bang and would remain congealed.
It's easy to say that, but can you demonstrate that this is what the theory predicts will happen? How do you know something else doesn't happen? This is why it's not good enough just to guess at what happens; you have to actually work it out. This involves lots of math and theory: quantum physics, general relativity, Feynman diagrams, path integrals, 4-vectors, etc. Proving or disproving these things actually takes a lot of work.
Offline
Sometimes it is not so easy to say the truth: Dark matter would predominate matter at the Big Bang. They both would be together from the begining. This would be ireversable and is not the case observed now.
Dark matter theory is disproven for the reasons I have given above. I also have solved the real origin of the fast orbiting outer galactic stars.
Mitch Raemsch
Offline
Nicholas wrote:
Dark matter would predominate matter at the Big Bang. They both would be together from the begining. This would be ireversable
How do you know? Can you prove this using the formalism of the accepted theory?
Nicholas wrote:
Dark matter theory is disproven for the reasons I have given above. I also have solved the real origin of the fast orbiting outer galactic stars.
What preposterous nonsense. If the accepted theory can be disproved by merely making general statements like this, people would have done this decades ago. What exactly do you think professional cosmologists do with their time? And do you really think you're the only one to ever think that the expansion of space might explain the orbits of the outer galaxies? If that worked then it wouldn't be a mystery, now would it?
Offline
People cannot see the nose on their face. Where ever there is matter there would be Dark matter if they were togther at the Big Bang.
This is clearly not true. Dark matter theory is thus effectively disproven.
Mitch Raemsch
Offline
