Physics education research, electronic materials, and the musings of Christopher Moore, Ph.D.
Physics education research, electronic materials, and the musings of Christopher Moore, Ph.D.
You are not logged in.
Is it time to understand how our mind actually perceives space-time before we try to THEORIZE space-time. Is it time to first have a theory on how our mind reasons and is aware before we try to theorize space-time. Is it time to establish a professional-contemporary medical theory of consciousness before we then use our mind to understand what it is we are perceiving. If so, visit www.streamsystems.com.au hit the "download now" button to download the 5MB pdf file. As the website suggests, it is a NEW SCIENCE, different to our contemporary understanding of space-time as a science would have it.
Last edited by streamSystems (2007-05-24 09:28:51)
Offline
I have moved this thread to epistemology where it belongs.
Offline
I briefly scrolled through all 200+ pages of your ramblings and was able to find only one equation. It is as follows:
I get the impression from what you write that you have some idea on how to build a device that "generates" gravity by "bracing" a virtual atom. At the end, you discuss cost projections (although you never actually project a cost).
BTW, I re-moved this back to "New Theories", mostly because you aren't really claiming some new epistemology. You are just really confused about what science is.
Offline
I don't expect anyone to offer a sincere comment about any piece of writing that they just briskly glance through. I remember the time when I sent my work off to a well-known scientist, titled the book "the solar system", only to be told by him that he is not an astronomer (he only read the cover). There are equations in the book, all the equations for a sphere, for instance, derived from a "new" mathematics and science. I am not confused though about what science is......I know the OLD sciences.
Offline
I don't expect anyone to offer a sincere comment about any piece of writing that they just briskly glance through.
Maybe you should be more concise.
I remember the time when I sent my work off to a well-known scientist, titled the book "the solar system", only to be told by him that he is not an astronomer (he only read the cover).
All scientists are very busy doing real science, and I would imagine a well-know scientist would be even more busy. Again, maybe you should be more concise.
... derived from a "new" mathematics and science.
Please show exactly how you can derive, say, Newton's law of gravitation using your "new science". Also, I'd be interested in seeing how you could obtain an expression for the tunneling current through a potential barrier using your new mathematics and science.
Offline
Space?
Look down your hallway. You will see it shrink down the distance. This is dimensionality.
Mitch Raemsch
Offline
