About -- Forum -- Articles -- Tutorials -- Books -- Apparel -- Contact

You are not logged in.

Announcement

#1 2007-04-08 15:26:45

junkfunkydude
New Member
Registered: 2007-04-08
Posts: 3

Peltier

This might be a stupid question, but is Imax on a peltier cell watts of electricity, or watts of heat moved?

If it is watts of heat moved, does that mean you could do a simple efficiency calculation with a tested watt (electrical) value and the watt (thermal) value from the specs?

Last edited by junkfunkydude (2007-04-08 15:27:16)

Offline

 

#2 2007-04-08 19:24:21

Chris
Assistant Professor
From: Longwood University
Registered: 2004-09-30
Posts: 754
Website

Re: Peltier

What exactly are you referring to when you state "Imax"?


Chemists are physicists who don't do math. smile

Offline

 

#3 2007-04-09 00:58:58

junkfunkydude
New Member
Registered: 2007-04-08
Posts: 3

Re: Peltier

I mean I(max) it is used in electrical spec sheets often. The letter I refers to electrical power, just as I is used in Ohm's Law. Max means that it is the peak rating.

Or at least that's what it means in an electircal spec sheet. I don't know if it refers to electrical or thermal power in this instance.

Offline

 

#4 2007-04-09 18:18:05

Chris
Assistant Professor
From: Longwood University
Registered: 2004-09-30
Posts: 754
Website

Re: Peltier

OK. For some reason I thought you were talking about Imax theaters.

The letter I generally refers to the current, with LaTeX Image designating the maximum current that can safely pass through a device. Your reference to Ohm's Law also suggests that you are talking about the current and not the power. They are two different concepts.

Specifically for a Peltier device, LaTeX Image on a spec sheet would refer to the maximum current that can pass through the p-n junction without burning out the device. However, the amount of heat (difference in temp. between the "hot" and "cold" sides) is roughly proportional to the current, so the larger LaTeX Image is, the greater difference in temperature one can achieve.


Chemists are physicists who don't do math. smile

Offline

 

#5 2007-04-09 18:42:19

junkfunkydude
New Member
Registered: 2007-04-08
Posts: 3

Re: Peltier

I'm not sure about dT being directly proportional to Imax. on my 38w cell, dT is 67 C, while on the 92w model, dT is 68 C. I assume the 92w would move heat more quickly, but still archive ruffly the same result, but I really don't understand peltiers all that well.

Offline

 

#6 2007-04-09 20:04:23

Chris
Assistant Professor
From: Longwood University
Registered: 2004-09-30
Posts: 754
Website

Re: Peltier

You are continuing to confuse the concepts of power and current. These are two very different concepts.

For a given p-n junction, the heat transfer is proportional to the current through the junction. That is the mechanism by which the Peltier Effect works. However, most Peltier devices are made up of several junctions. Also, different Peltier devices may be made from different materials, so you cannot compare one to the other in the manner you suggest. If you measure the applied current vs. the change in temperature for the same device, then the relationship will be linear (or at least close).

When you look at the spec sheet for your device, does it say the following:

LaTeX Image = 38 W

I would be very surprised if it did.


Chemists are physicists who don't do math. smile

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
© Copyright 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson



Copyright © J. Christopher Moore Publishing, All Rights Reserved