Comments for ilovephysics.com

Comment on 9/11 Troofers are Idiots by ChrisNewYork

ChrisNewYork — Wed, 01 Feb 2012 06:20:24 +0000

9/11 Commissioners Lee Hamilton & Thomas Kean “Commission was set up to fail”
Thomas Kean(Chairman)and Lee H. Hamilton(Vice Chairman)say? that. That link to a movie posted by” Geekengineer”. Building on the video is i believe block of flats( they build a lot of them in Poland in 70s 80s)…. those buildings are a mess… even an explosion from a SMALL propane container could demolish half of the block. There is a reason why high rise buildings have a structural frame. Tractors on this video pulled Carrier wall( im not sure if this is correct name for that part of structure- English is not my first language.) Thats why building collapsed like that, in high rise buildings steel frame is an carrier element. To accomplish have the same effect in wtc1 and 2 and 7 steel frame had to be destroyed.

Comment on 9/11 Troofers are Idiots by ChrisNewYork

ChrisNewYork — Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:23:33 +0000

” 9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out”

50 top experts in their fields — high-rise architects, structural engineers, physicists, chemical engineers, firefighters, metallurgists, explosives experts, controlled demolition technicians, and more. Each is highly qualified in his/her respective fields. Several have Ph.D’s — including National Medal of Science awardee Lynn Margulis. She, along with the other experts, exposes the fraud of NIST and discusses how the scientific method should have been applied and acknowledges the “overwhelming” evidence of high temperature incendiaries in all dust samples of the WTC. High-rise architects and structural engineers layout the evidence in the features of the destruction of these three high-rises that point inevitably to explosive controlled demolition.

…so you say that all those Technical & Building Professionals with a lot more experience than you are………… Troofers and idiots…
oh there is more…… actually” troofers” pilots… they say that official story is impossible too… what they can know about flying- right?
” Pilots for 9-11 Truth – World Trade Center Attack”

Those two documents are professional documents, nothing like” loose change” video. Simple questions- is it possible….. and simple answers: why an official story doesnt add up.
2 +2= 4 always, but official story says some thing else. I know that most of those ppl who say: NO IT CANT BE POSSIBLE dont even bother to have a second look.
” Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.” — Herman Goering

Comment on Moon landing hoax: People believe the dumbest things by Me

Me — Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:12:31 +0000

Mythbusters? Hahaha okay! We have never been to the moon, we can’t with our technology today, imagine 1960′s technology,

But you keep believing what Mythbusters have to say…

Comment on Common misconceptions: light slows down in a medium by afreen

afreen — Thu, 26 Jan 2012 12:01:46 +0000

I hv a questn that we also stdy that wave lngth is decreased whn it enter in glass or water so i only wnt to know this hppn due to this time delay while in photo electrc effect ,we neglect the time delay whn enrgy trnsferd frm phtn to electrn

Comment on Problem Solution Generator by Thor

Thor — Sun, 11 Dec 2011 19:48:38 +0000

Is the statement, “The bigger they are, the harder they fall”, true? Explain your answer considering the ideas of scaling and how cross sectional area and volume increase when linear dimensions are increased.

Comment on Moon landing hoax: People believe the dumbest things by Christopher Moore

Christopher Moore — Wed, 07 Dec 2011 14:41:41 +0000

I suggest watching the MythBusters episode on the “Moon Landing Hoax.” They actually did a pretty decent job no this one.

http://mythbustersresults.com/nasa-moon-landing

Comment on Moon landing hoax: People believe the dumbest things by hari

hari — Sun, 04 Dec 2011 09:04:56 +0000

CHRIS ::: There were several allegations about the moon landing done by the americans ! yes ! indeed the doubts were
1. what made the flag fly on an airless atmosphere ?
2.moon soil i so dry ! how can there be footmarks made on it ??
3.there were more than one shadow in some pics of the austronauts .but th eonly source is sun ! how cud there be more than one shadow???

hope these questions can be answered ~~

Comment on 9/11 Troofers are Idiots by geekengineer

geekengineer — Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:16:48 +0000

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/sep/28/al-qaida-ahmadinejad-911-conspiracy

Comment on A Brief Tutorial on Kinematics by DEEAPAK

DEEAPAK — Fri, 09 Sep 2011 15:24:49 +0000

ITS BEST FOR UNDERSTANDING

Comment on Common Misconceptions: Work Done by Magnetic Field by Vipul

Vipul — Mon, 08 Aug 2011 18:59:46 +0000

HI! I wanted to ask that in the case of motional emf, or more elaborately, when a thin metallic wire is moving with a velocity v in a direction perpendicular to the direction (say downwards into the plane of paper) of magnetic field, there is an induced emf in the wire, which results from the displacement of electrons apparently in the direction of magnetic force. Now this should have some work being done on the electron, but you said above that no work is done? How is it so?