By Christopher Moore
My wife is watching “Dancing with the Stars”. I’m working; however, I am upset Penn Jillett was kicked off the show even though I’ve never actually seen him dance since I don’t normally pay much attention while my wife watches. His show “Bullsh@t” on Showtime is a terrific show for anyone interested in real science and the debunking of psuedo-science.
Anyway, I digress. The reason for this post is that the Jonas Brothers were playing on the show. I had never heard them before. Now I have heard them — twice in the last hour — and they are absolutely terrible. They are technically bad. Just awful.
[end pointless rant]
By Christopher Moore
The San Fransisco Chronicle reports that a Quaker math teacher was fired for refusing to sign an oath of allegiance. This is not necessarily physics news, but having gone to Guilford College and having a background in the Society of Friends, this is an interesting story to me.
Marianne Kearney-Brown, a Quaker and graduate student who began teaching remedial math to undergrads Jan. 7, lost her $700-a-month part-time job after refusing to sign an 87-word Oath of Allegiance to the Constitution that the state requires of elected officials and public employees.
You see, Ms. Kearney-Brown did the following each time the oath was presented to her:
Each time, when asked to “swear (or affirm)” that she would “support and defend” the U.S. and state Constitutions “against all enemies, foreign and domestic,” Kearney-Brown inserted revisions: She wrote “nonviolently” in front of the word “support,” crossed out “swear,” and circled “affirm.” All were to conform with her Quaker beliefs, she said.
She refused to sign the statement unaltered, and she was fired.
You see, Quakers have this little hang-up on non-violence. It’s nothing big, really, it’s just sort of one of the foundations of the religion. The oath as written is like asking a Hindu to swear to defend the constitution from all enemies, including cows. Also, the statement is vague. Very vague. What constitutes an enemy of the constitution? I claim that a large majority of our Representatives in Congress are “enemies” to the constitution. Who defines “enemies”? And what constitutes “defend”.
Ms. Kearney-Brown makes the following point:
All they care about is my name on an unaltered loyalty oath. They don’t care if I meant it, and it didn’t seem connected to the spirit of the oath. Nothing else mattered. My teaching didn’t matter. Nothing.
